Compare and contrast two movies essay example things is something we do every day when we have to make decisions. For example, you might think of similarities or differences when we are buying a new MP3 player or choosing a place to study English. You may need to evaluate two sides of an issue you have studied in a class or two proposals for research or projects at your workplace. In these cases, you will need to write an essay or report to discuss your ideas about the topic.
This is a comparison and contrast essay. Some of the essay topics below may seem to contain subjects that have nothing in common. You’ll find contrasting characteristics as well as similar characteristics in each individual set. Your happiest day to your saddest day. Have you already grabbed a topic for you compare and contrast essay?
By the way, feel free to leave a comment below which one you’ve chosen, so that your classmates know and avoid repetition. A List of Informative Speech Topics: Pick Only Awesome Ideas! Why Are There Frogs Falling from the Sky? Culture Snob’s first offering for its own Misunderstood Blog-a-thon. Why does nobody take the frogs seriously?
In Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia, the cataclysmic, apocalyptic rain of frogs seems casually accepted. That’s some fucked-up shit, those frogs. You know, I was with it right up until the frogs. I led a small-group discussion on the movie last year, and nobody had any problem with the amphibians, and nobody ascribed a grand meaning to them. Stanley is a child, though, and it’s dangerous to confuse his extensive knowledge of trivial facts with wisdom. So: What are we to make of the frogs? Most Christians and Jews will recognize the frogs as a motif from Exodus.
The frogs are one of the plagues that visit Egypt as God tries to compel Pharaoh to release the Israelites from enslavement. You probably knew all of those things, but that basic background doesn’t illuminate what the frogs mean, or why they’re so prominently featured in a seemingly irreligious movie. Magnolia has but one devout character — police officer Jim Kurring — and the script implicitly mocks him as a simpleton whose piety seems contingent on favorable treatment from God. When he loses his gun, he thinks the Lord has abandoned him and begs for help. Kurring is good-hearted but not rigorous in his faith. And the movie is populated with lost, lonely people. They’re miserable, and many of them are wicked to boot.
These characters are so far gone that only something nearly miraculous could awaken them from their moral and spiritual slumber. You might dispute the divine source of the frogs, noting that reports of natural frog precipitation are hardly unprecedented. But the movie offers no hint of a rational explanation. More importantly, a scientific accounting for the frogs would render them meaningless as a narrative device. And if the frogs are insignificant beyond assisting the plot, then Magnolia must be a terrible, lazy movie. Either the frogs are an essential, pregnant component of the film, or they ruin it. I subscribe to the former view, and the only way to justify the frogs is to bring God into the picture — the jealous, angry, ostentatious Lord of the Old Testament.
Sometimes you gotta break out the big guns, particularly when people are this spiritually dead. And once you have their attention, you can add a little sugar. The climatic fury is tempered in the denouement by the simple truths spoken by Stanley and Jim, and the gentle assistance offered by Jim and Phil, and the mother’s comfort given by Rose. They inject some New Testament values: Love thy neighbor, and treat others as you’d like to be treated. You have to be nicer to me.